Fukushima residents angered as court rules government is not liable for damages in nuclear crisis

Fukushima residents angered as court rules government is not liable for damages in nuclear crisis

Japanese plaintiffs in four lawsuits, many nevertheless displaced in and outside of Fukushima since a 2011 nuclear crisis, had their bid to sue the government denied on Friday in a highly expected ruling.

The ruling Friday — which applied to some 3,700 Fukushima residents — was the first information from the top court for evacuees who demanded that the state, not just the utility, pay compensation for the damages inflicted to their lives.

The four-estimate bench headed by Hiroyuki Kanno said that the government could not be held liable for the disaster because damage from the tsunami of that extent could not have been prevented already if the industry minister had used his regulatory authority and ordered the utility to enhance a seawall based on a tsunami calculate at that time.

Seiju Nanbara, who joined the lawsuit two years after he evacuated from his home in Minamisoma, just north of the wrecked plant, to Chiba, said he and other plaintiffs who heard the ruling in the courtroom were speechless because they were so disappointed.

“The ruling only looked at the government, not us,” the 62-year-old said. “I don’t think the judges understood, or already tried to understand our pain.”

Chief lawyer Izutaro Managi said, “The ruling is absolutely unacceptable,” as he rushed out from the courtroom to proportion the decision with the plaintiffs and their supporters who waited outside.

“The court did not squarely confront or respond to the questions we raised.”

Lawyer Izutaro Managi speaks to plaintiffs and their supporters after hearing the decision of the Tokyo Supreme Court on Friday. (Eugene Hoshiko/The Associated Press)

He criticized the ruling for failing to address the question over whether the disaster was foreseeable, or if it could have been avoided had the government taken appropriate steps.

Hundreds of plaintiffs and their supporters outside the court showed anger, disappointment and disbelief, but many said they will continue their fight for a better decision in the pending situations.

“We must not let this ruing affect the pending lawsuits,” Managi said.

Ruling could set precedent for other suits

The ruling, which reversed three of the four high-court decisions that acknowledged the government’s responsibility, could affect about 30 other similar lawsuits pending across the country.

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant suffered triple meltdowns following the extent-9.0 quake and tsunami on March 11, 2011, spreading enormous radiation in the area and displacing more than 160,000 people at one point.

WATCH | From 2021: Incentives offered to return to Fukushima, but not all are takers:

Inside Fukushima a decade after tsunami, nuclear disaster

Adrienne Arsenault visits Fukushima, Japan to see what life is like 10 years after the vicinity was hit by an earthquake that set off a tsunami and nuclear disaster killing more than 18,000 people and displacing nearly half a million others.

The situations against the government and the plant operator Tokyo Electric strength Company Holdings (TEPCO) were originally filed separately in Fukushima and three other prefectures — Gunma, Chiba and Ehime — where the plaintiffs evacuated.

Currently, only TEPCO is obliged to cover damages worth over 1.4 billion yen ($13.75 million Cdn).

The argument centred on whether the government could have foreseen the risk of a enormous tsunami based on a tsunami prediction report, and whether the accident could have been averted if the government had ordered TEPCO to take precautions.

The attention also focused on the reliability of a long-term assessment of seismic activities released by a government expert panel in 2002, nine years before the accident.

Criminal case involving officials current

The government argued that the report was not reliable and the accident was unavoidable.

The plaintiffs said the tsunami assessment was credible and the government should have used it as a basis to order the utility to take tsunami prevention measures. They said the disaster could have been avoided if the government had instructed TEPCO properly.

Quirks and Quarks8:06Study finds wildlife in Fukushima’s exclusion zone show no signs of radiation damage

Survey of Fukushima’s animals shows no damage from radiation

A Tokyo District Court ruling in 2019 found three former TEPCO executives not guilty in a criminal case, saying they could not have foreseen the enormous tsunami.

Click: See details

leave your comment